Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10
Date
Msg-id 1341.1490884820@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Re: Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> I propose we go for a week delay in closing the commit fest, and we
>> decide right now.  Ideally I like to to see delay in one-week increments
>> _and_ announce that a week before each deadline.

> Summary of opinions on this thread:

> - Tom thinks the RMT should consider extending by a day or two.

FWIW, while I'm sure we had a reason (back at the Ottawa 2016 meeting)
for limiting the final 'fest to just a month, I'm quite sure we did
not allow for most of the senior hackers being at a conference during
the last week of that time.  So I now concur with Bruce's suggestion
that a week's delay would be suitable.

In past years this sort of decision would have been taken by -core,
and given the number of core members who have already weighed in
on this thread, I think Bruce's proposal would have passed easily.
But since we just delegated the setting of feature freeze to the RMT,
they are the ones who ought to do it.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Logical decoding on standby
Next
From: Petr Jelinek
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)