Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Preferred way to define 64-bit constants? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Preferred way to define 64-bit constants?
Date
Msg-id 1340562878.13589.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Preferred way to define 64-bit constants?  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Preferred way to define 64-bit constants?  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On sön, 2012-06-24 at 20:23 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> I just committed the patch to change XLogRecPtr into a 64-bit constant, 
> and I did this in the patch:
> 
> #define XLogSegmentsPerXLogId  (0x100000000LL / XLOG_SEG_SIZE)
> 
> But I started to wonder, is that LL representation the preferred way to 
> define 64-bit integer constants? I thought it is, but now that I grep 
> around, I don't see any constants like that in the source tree.

See INT64CONST, UINT64CONST.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL format changes
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: warning handling in Perl scripts