Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes:
>>> 18% in s_lock is definitely bad :-(. Were you able to determine which
>>> LWLock(s) are accounting for the contention?
>>
>> Yes. We were interested in that too. Some people did addtional tests
>> to determin that. I don't have the report handy now. I will report
>> back next week.
> Sorry for the delay. Finally I got the oprofile data. It's
> huge(34MB). If you are interested, I can put somewhere. Please let me
> know.
Yes, please.
regards, tom lane
