Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Date
Msg-id 1339554604.16373.52.camel@sussancws0025
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 2012-02-19 at 21:49 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>
> > v8 attached
>
> v10 attached.
>
> This patch covers all the valid concerns discussed and has been
> extensively tested.
>
> I expect to commit this in about 24 hours, so last call for comments
> please or say if you need more time to review.

I have made an attempt to merge this with master. This patch is not
meant to be the next version, and I have not made a real effort to be
sure this was a safe merge. I am just hoping this saves Simon some of
the tedious portions of the merge, and offers a reference point to see
where his merge differs from mine.

In the meantime, I'm looking at the original v10 patch against master as
it existed when Simon posted the patch.

I'd like to see checksums take part in the June commitfest.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Minimising windows installer password confusion
Next
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.3: load path to mitigate load penalty for checksums