Re: pg_upgrade missing - Mailing list pgsql-novice

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: pg_upgrade missing
Date
Msg-id 1339029642.25018.1.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade missing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-novice
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 16:42 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:

> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> > The message is simple: You need to keep 9.0 RPMs around, so that
> > pg_upgrade can run. Install them, too.
>
> You might want to think about adopting the packaging layout I'm using
> for Fedora: pg_upgrade and back-branch executables all wrapped into
> a separate subpackage.  Prevents this type of mistake.


It is nice for Fedora, but PGDG RPMs have the parallel installation
capability, so those binaries would conflict with the previous version.

Still, I could push a "pg_upgrade_from_9.1_to_9.2" (or whatever) RPM,
that would require both 9.0 and 9.1 to be installed, and use your
scripts to upgrade 9.1 to 9.2 (or so)

Regards,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

Attachment

pgsql-novice by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade missing
Next
From: Prima Chairunnanda
Date:
Subject: Buffer Management: Can dirty pages be written before transaction commits?