Re: hot standby PSQL 9.1 Windows 2008 Servers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From chinnaobi
Subject Re: hot standby PSQL 9.1 Windows 2008 Servers
Date
Msg-id 1337703338369-5709495.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: hot standby PSQL 9.1 Windows 2008 Servers  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: hot standby PSQL 9.1 Windows 2008 Servers
List pgsql-hackers
Dear Robert,

Thank you very much for the reply. 

You mean when the primary which is going to switch its role to standby might
not have sent all the WAL records to the standby and If it is switched to
standby it has more WAL records than the standby which is now serves as
primary. Is it ??

It is actually the standby server which has to be restored from archive when
it is switching to primary right .. Not the primary which is switching to
standby ??

Regards,
Reddy.

--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/hot-standby-PSQL-9-1-Windows-2008-Servers-tp5708637p5709495.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Florian Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Changing the concept of a DATABASE
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Per-Database Roles