On mån, 2012-05-07 at 10:50 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > - (Side point, the definition of endof() in the same place isn't used
> > anywhere, and doesn't look safe to me, because it can go one past the
> > end of memory.)
>
> That I think we could remove.
I decided to keep it because it was used not so long ago, so maybe it
still has value.
