Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ?
Date
Msg-id 1336209378.13755.11.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ?
List pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2012-05-04 at 15:59 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Can we at least have the xxx_to_json() functions try cast to json
> first
> > and fall back to text if the cast fails.
> 
> I think the idea that you can involve the casting machinery in this is
> misguided.  sometextval::json has got to mean that sometextval is
> expected to be in the form of a syntactically correct JSON value - and
> NOT that we wrap it in a JSON string.

I think it's only wrong if you try casting first and fall back to text.
Otherwise it could work, if the set of all json casts is defined
consistently.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON in 9.2 - Could we have just one to_json() function instead of two separate versions ?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: remove dead ports?