On Sat, 2012-04-21 at 15:39 +0200, Guillaume Lelarge wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 08:11 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
> > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 19:58 +0530, Ashesh Vashi wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Guillaume Lelarge
> > >> > <guillaume@lelarge.info> wrote:
> > >> > > Hi,
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I was trying to fix a bug on dlgDomain, and I found this code (in
> > >> > > pgadmin/schema/pgDomain.cpp):
> > >> > >
> > >> > > wxString conname = set->GetVal(wxT("conname"));
> > >> > > if (!conname.StartsWith(wxT("$")))
> > >> > > check += wxT("CONSTRAINT ") + qtIdent(conname) + wxT(" ");
> > >> > >
> > >> > > I'm wondering why we look for a dollar sign in the first character of a
> > >> > > check constraint in a domain. It means nothing to me. Could it be some
> > >> > > GreenPlum or EnterpriseDB specific code? or is it something else?
> > >> >
> > >> > Not that I recall - Ashesh, Sachin - do you know if it's a PPAS thing?
> > >> >
> > >> Not that I recall.
> > >>
> > >> It's been there from very long time..
> > >> i.e. git log 6003c502d89900b2b2e1538d340db028b1880aa1 -p -n 1
> > >> schema/pgDomain.cpp
> > >>
> > >
> > > OK. I got rid of it, but I'm still working on enhancing the domains
> > > code. I now have a Constraints node under each domain object, and a new
> > > tab in dlgDomain to add as many constraints as you want (only check
> > > constraints of course). See screenshots attached.
> > >
> > > I still need to test it more thoroughly.
> >
> > Nice!
> >
>
> Thanks. I continued the work on this patch. It's almost ready to be
> commited. Unfortunately, I still have one issue. The contextual menu of
> the Constraints node doesn't allow the user to add a new constraint
> (check constraint for a domain, all kind of constraints for a table). I
> can still add a constraint when I select the domain (or table), and
> right click to get the contextual menu. See patch attached. Any ideas
> why it behaves this way?
>
OK, found the issue. Much easier to find a bug when using gdb (and
knowing how to use it).
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
