Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result
Date
Msg-id 1332862194-sup-1033@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:

> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
> to commit the patch for 9.2?

I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
from there and committed into 9.2.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers patch v18
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers patch v18