Re: patch: autocomplete for functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: patch: autocomplete for functions
Date
Msg-id 1332780552.3800.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch: autocomplete for functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On mån, 2012-03-19 at 15:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> This connects somewhat to the discussions we've had in the past about
> trying to get not-intended-for-public-use functions out of the
> standard search path.  Not that you want to put a full visibility
> check into the tab-completion query, but if it could simply exclude a
> "pg_private" namespace, that probably wouldn't be too expensive.

I wonder if this could be worked out using pg_depend.  For example, give
me all functions that are not referenced by some object in pg_catalog.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd out of memory problem.
Next
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Odd out of memory problem.