Re: patch: autocomplete for functions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: patch: autocomplete for functions
Date
Msg-id 1331917648.8940.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch: autocomplete for functions  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: patch: autocomplete for functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2012-03-15 at 16:36 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Peter Eisentraut's message of jue mar 15 16:25:53 -0300 2012:
> > On sön, 2012-02-19 at 20:10 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > > I found so this extremely simple patch should be useful.
> > > 
> > > It helps for pattern SELECT fx();
> > 
> > Isn't that just a subset of what I had proposed?
> > 
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/1328820579.11241.4.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
> 
> So do you intend to commit your patch?

Well, there was quite a bit of discussion about it, but it appears that
most concerns were addressed at the end.  So yes, I guess, unless
someone wants further discussion.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, v16
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: Create index on foreign table