Re: count on transaction ID - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From ddgs
Subject Re: count on transaction ID
Date
Msg-id 1331570077139-5558345.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: count on transaction ID  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: count on transaction ID
List pgsql-performance
Is it a good starting point to the basic reason of doing vacuum?
from the manual,
"PostgreSQL's VACUUM command must be run on a regular basis for several
reasons:
To recover disk space occupied by updated or deleted rows.
To update data statistics used by the PostgreSQL query planner.
To protect against loss of very old data due to transaction ID wraparound.
"

It seems that only  transaction ID wraparound can cause system failure in
loading-in new data.
For the dead rows problem, it just a matter of space; the data statistics is
just relate to the query performance.


--
View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/count-on-transaction-ID-tp5550894p5558345.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Tomas Vondra"
Date:
Subject: Re: Advice on Controller card for SAS disks
Next
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Tuning wizard