Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date
Msg-id 1330808068-sup-7527@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Alvaro Herrera's message of sáb mar 03 16:54:19 -0300 2012:
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of sáb mar 03 02:25:52 -0300 2012:

> > 3. THE ARE NOT CARET - this is really important

> I am not sure about the caret thingy -- mainly because I don't think it
> works all that well.  I don't know how psql does it, but I notice that
> it shows a single line in a multiline query -- so it's not just a matter
> of adding some number of spaces.

I checked how this works in psql.  It is upwards of 200 lines of code --
see reportErrorPosition in libpq/fe-protocol3.c.  I'm not sure this can
be made to work sensibly here.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
Next
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory usage during sorting