Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement
Date
Msg-id 1330656096-sup-1201@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: review: CHECK FUNCTION statement  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
I've cleaned up the backend code a bit -- see attached.  More yet to go
through; I'm mainly sending it out for you (and everyone, really) to
give your opinion on my changes so far.

(I split out the plpgsql checker for the time being into a separate
branch; I'll get on it after I get this part committed.)

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2