Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Date
Msg-id 1330621236.23823.1.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Shigeru Hanada <shigeru.hanada@gmail.com>)
Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2012-03-01 at 20:56 +0900, Shigeru Hanada wrote:
> How about moving postgresql_fdw_validator into dblink,

That's probably a good move.  If this were C++, we might try to subclass
this whole thing a bit, to avoid code duplication, but I don't see an
easy way to do that here.

>  with renaming to dblink_fdw_validator? 

Well, it's not the validator of the dblink_fdw, so maybe something like
basic_postgresql_fdw_validator.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: COPY with hints, rebirth
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib