Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
Date
Msg-id 13287.1338477799@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
List pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On 31 May 2012 15:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If we want to finish the beta cycle in a reasonable time period and get
>> back to actual development, we have to refrain from adding more
>> possibly-destabilizing development work to 9.2. �And that is what
>> this is.

> In what way is it possibly destabilising?

I'm prepared to believe that it only affects performance, but it could
be destabilizing to that.  It needs proper review and testing, and the
next CF is the right environment for that to happen.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Next
From: Sergey Koposov
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.2beta1, parallel queries, ReleasePredicateLocks, CheckForSerializableConflictIn in the oprofile