On sön, 2012-01-15 at 08:14 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It would possibly have some documentary value too. Just looking very
> quickly at Peter's patch, I don't really understand his assertion that
> this would significantly butcher the code. The worst effect would be
> that in a few cases we'd have to break up multiple declarations where
> one of the variables was in this class. That doesn't seem like a
> tragedy.
Well, I'll prepare a patch like that and then you can judge.
