Re: HA options - Mailing list pgsql-general

From David Morton
Subject Re: HA options
Date
Msg-id 1326750438.61126.YahooMailNeo@web96002.mail.aue.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to HA options  (Tim Uckun <timuckun@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: HA options  (Tim Uckun <timuckun@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
Is shared storage an option for you ? We've had a fairly pleasant experience with shared storage partnered up with SLES and its HAE (high availability extension) suite using a Pacemaker cluster for resource control. On top of this we replicate to a hot standby server offsite, however used for reporting and not failover for us.


From: Tim Uckun <timuckun@gmail.com>
To: pgsql-general <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 17 January 2012 10:34 AM
Subject: [GENERAL] HA options

Hey Guys.

It's been a while since I looked into this and it seems like new
options have cropped up for postgres HA and scalability.  Is there a
consensus on the "best" way to achieve HA. My primary concern is HA
but of course any scalability gains would be more than welcome.  All
the servers will be virtual on either rackspace or amazon so that's
possibly a complication.

The options I am looking at are.

http://postgres-xc.sourceforge.net/  Is this production ready?
http://www.repmgr.org/
http://www.pgpool.net/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
http://www.continuent.com/downloads/documentation
http://www.drbd.org/ ??
Built in hot standby and hand rolled scripts.

are there others I should look at?

Thanks

--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tim Uckun
Date:
Subject: HA options
Next
From: Tim Uckun
Date:
Subject: Re: HA options