On sön, 2012-01-08 at 22:22 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 21:53, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > I've recently had a possible need for telling pg_basebackup how to
> > handle symlinks in the remote data directory, instead of ignoring them,
> > which is what currently happens. Possible options were recreating the
> > symlink locally (pointing to a file on the local system) or copying the
> > file the symlink points to. This is mainly useful in scenarios where
> > configuration files are symlinked from the data directory. Has anyone
> > else had the need for this? Is it worth pursuing?
>
> Yes.
>
> I came up to the same issue though - in one case it would've been best
> to copy the link, in the other case it would've been best to copy the
> contents of the file :S Couldn't decide which was most important...
> Maybe a switch would be needed?
Yes. Do we need to preserve the third behavior of ignoring symlinks?
tar has an -h option that causes symlinks to be followed. The default
there is to archive the symlink itself.
