On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 15:43 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 3:36 PM, David Vaillancourt
> <david_v@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > Dave,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick feedback. I'm really surprised that people who use VCS
> > for their 'normal' code, wouldn't see a use for the same when it comes to DB
> > Schema/DDL versions.
> > In any case, my goal is not to add the functionality directly to PGAdmin,
> > but rather create a plugin for PGadmin to use.
>
> Yeah, the current plugin architecture really isn't suited to that I
> doubt - its pretty simplistic. I certainly have objections to that
> being enhanced though.
>
Which objections? just to know, because I don't see any reasons to
object on enhancing the plugin architecture without knowing the proposed
enhancements.
> > As I mentionned earlier, the extent of the modifications to PGadmin would be
> > to extend the plugin framework to allow a tighter coupling between plugins
> > and PGadmin.
> > I guess maintaining a plugin is different from maintaining yet another
> > feature in the existing PGAdmin code, correct me if i'm wrong.
>
> Currently a "plugin" is really just an external application that
> pgAdmin can fire up and pass command line options to.
>
+1
> > Finally, since no one wanted to use the VCS feature in PGadmin, what do
> > teams of developers use to track versions of Schemas (Tables, Views,
> > Procedures...)?
> > Do most developers simply not use any? Or do the 'hack' their own? I'd be
> > surprised if they used proprietary tools ...
>
> Well, views may have changed now - the original code was probably
> written nearly 10 years ago. However, the PostgreSQL infrastructure
> team just tend to keep SQL scripts in GIT and update them when
> necessary. For the Postgres Enterprise Manager product that I work on
> in my day job (which happens to be based on pgAdmin), we maintain one
> script which creates a fresh database from scratch (pemserver.sql),
> and incremental scripts to upgrade an existing database from one
> version to another (eg. 2_0_0-2_0_1.sql, 2_0_1-2_0_2.sql and so one).
> All of those are version controlled in GIT as well.
>
Looks like a PostgreSQL extension to me :)
--
Guillaume
http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
http://www.dalibo.com
PostgreSQL Sessions #3: http://www.postgresql-sessions.org
