Re: Compatible defaults for LEAD/LAG - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Compatible defaults for LEAD/LAG
Date
Msg-id 1322228.1604524349@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Compatible defaults for LEAD/LAG  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Compatible defaults for LEAD/LAG
List pgsql-hackers
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> út 22. 9. 2020 v 2:33 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
>> Anyway, attached find
>> 0001 - updates Vik's original patch to HEAD and tweaks the
>> grammar in the docs a bit.
>> 0002 - add-on patch to convert array_append, array_prepend,
>> array_cat, array_position, array_positions, array_remove,
>> array_replace, and width_bucket to use anycompatiblearray.
>> I think 0001 is committable, but 0002 is just WIP since
>> I didn't touch the docs.  I'm slightly discouraged about
>> whether 0002 is worth proceeding with.  Any thoughts?

> I think so 0002 has sense - more than doc I miss related regress tests, but
> it is partially covered by anycompatible tests

I didn't see any need for particularly exhaustive testing, but
I did add one new test for an operator and one for a function.
Pushed with that and the necessary docs work.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: automatic analyze: readahead - add "IO read time" log message
Next
From: Ranier Vilela
Date:
Subject: Re: Dereference before NULL check (src/backend/storage/ipc/latch.c)