Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alexander Shulgin
Subject Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq
Date
Msg-id 1322137763-sup-9421@moon
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of Thu Nov 24 13:57:17 +0200 2011:
>
> I think it would be really weird not to support user:pw@host:port.  You can presumably also support the JDBC style
forbackward compatibility, but I don't think we should adopt that syntax as project standard. 

Well, I don't believe JDBC syntax is ideal either, but I don't recall any better option proposed in the original
discussion:http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg01945.php 

Do you suggest that we should reconsider?

--
Alex


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Notes on implementing URI syntax for libpq
Next
From: Richard Huxton
Date:
Subject: Re: Time bug with small years