Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 17:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> However, now that I know the real issue is you're using inet_addr, I
>> would like to know why you're not using inet_aton instead; or even
>> better, something that also copes with IPv6.
> "Path of least resistance?"
> Which method would you suggest?
I haven't actually read the RADIUS patch, but generally we rely on
pg_getaddrinfo_all to interpret strings representing IP addresses.
Is there a reason not to use that?
regards, tom lane