On tis, 2011-10-18 at 09:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > It is a pity we can't just tell the compiler to turn off the warning in
> > a particular case.
>
> I haven't tested, but won't an explicit cast to void silence the
> warning?
>
> (void) fwrite(...);
No, tried that already. You could try
rc = write(...); (void) rc;
> There are places, notably the calls in elog.c, where ignoring write
> failures is the right thing. I think that what Kevin was on about
> was something else entirely, namely whether we need to retry writes
> to disk. I would hope that we're not simply not bothering to check
> in any cases where it matters.
No, I believe we are OK everywhere else. We are only ignoring the
result in cases where we are trying to report errors in the first place.
