Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ... - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Leonardo Francalanci
Subject Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Date
Msg-id 131872.8446.qm@web29013.mail.ird.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
List pgsql-hackers
> Hmm, maybe I spoke too soon.  With 9000 child tables I get  a profile
> like this:


Well, the 9000-table-test-case was meant to check the difference in
performance with/without the patch... I don't see the reason for trying
to optimize such an unrealistic case.

BTW can someone explain to me which are the cases where the
patch actually helps?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...