Re: Decimal vs. Bigint memory usage - Mailing list pgsql-general

From planas
Subject Re: Decimal vs. Bigint memory usage
Date
Msg-id 1317308758.8331.4.camel@planas-pingy-1104
Whole thread Raw
In response to Decimal vs. Bigint memory usage  (Gregor Vollmer <vollmer@ekp.uni-karlsruhe.de>)
List pgsql-general
Gregor

On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 14:15 +0200, Gregor Vollmer wrote:
Dear List,

we are currently updating our application to use multiple database 
backends, the main backend on our site will be Postgres, though.

Some of our columns exceed the limit of the 'integer' type, now we are 
discussing the alternatives. Personally, I would use bigint since it 
should suffice in most cases, but using decimal is under discussion, 
too, because our modules would be able to precisely specify their 
required column sizes.

We do not do any arithmetic on the columns, only saving and retrieval, 
is decimal as fast as bigint in that case?

How does decimal store the number internally, is it a fixed size 
through-out all rows and how does it compare to bigint?

Thanks in advance,
Gregor

My preference is to use bigint since you are already using integer. It depends on what the values mean and how you use them whether decimal could be used. Are these values used at all in any queries?

--
Jay Lozier
jslozier@gmail.com

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: bytea columns and large values
Next
From: senthilnathan
Date:
Subject: pg_stat_replication data in standy servers