Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used
Date
Msg-id 13172.1152937781@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The fundamental problem with find_static is that it hasn't got a clue
>> about likely future changes, nor about what we think external add-ons
>> might want ...

> OK, I don't really have a clue either.  Is any of it valid?

I don't object to static-izing AlterOpClassOwner_oid or
RenameRewriteRule, and I defer to Teodor about the gist and gin
functions.  The others range somewhere between "no" and "hell no".
        regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Patch to mark items as static or not used