Marc Munro <marc@bloodnok.com> writes:
> Since I was unable to dynamically assign a LWLock using
> LWLockAssign (none available), I have fairly arbitrarily overloaded the
> use of existing LWLocks. When the flames die down perhaps we can
> discuss making a small number (one would be enough for me) of LWLocks
> available.
Perhaps you missed the comment in NumLWLocks()?
regards, tom lane
