Excerpts from Magnus Hagander's message of vie sep 23 11:31:37 -0300 2011:
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 15:55, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > This seems strange to me. Why not have a second option to let the user
> > indicate the desired SSL verification?
> >
> > sslmode=disable/allow/prefer/require
> > sslverify=none/ca-if-present/ca/full
> >
> > (ca-if-present being the current "require" sslmode behavior).
> >
> > We could then deprecate sslmode=verify and verify-full and have them be
> > synonyms of sslmode=require and corresponding sslverify.
>
> Hmm. I agree that the other suggestion was a bit weird, but I'm not
> sure I like the multiple-options approach either. That's going to
> require redesign of all software that deals with it at all today :S
Why? They could continue to use the existing options; or switch to the
new options if they wanted different behavior, as is the case of the OP.
> Maybe we should just update the docs and be done with it :-)
That's another option, sure ... :-)
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
