Re: Is 9.1 considered more stable/robust than 9.0.4 ? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: Is 9.1 considered more stable/robust than 9.0.4 ?
Date
Msg-id 1316678450.15614.9.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Is 9.1 considered more stable/robust than 9.0.4 ?  ("Abraham, Danny" <danny_abraham@bmc.com>)
Responses why VOLATILE attribute is required?  (Rafal Pietrak <rafal@zorro.isa-geek.com>)
List pgsql-general

http://blog.2ndquadrant.com/en/2011/09/limitations-removed-in-postgre.html


On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 02:36 -0500, Abraham, Danny wrote:
> Thanks
> Danny


--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

Attachment

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: "Abraham, Danny"
Date:
Subject: Is 9.1 considered more stable/robust than 9.0.4 ?
Next
From: Alexander Rüegg
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows: where to put pgpass.conf for user "system"