On fre, 2011-09-16 at 01:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> As far as the other issues go, I think there is actually a
> prerequisite
> discussion to be had here, which is whether we are turning the
> recovery
> parameters into plain old GUCs or not. If they are plain old GUCs,
> then
> they will presumably still have their values when we are *not* doing
> recovery. That leads to a couple of questions:
> * will seeing these values present in pg_settings confuse anybody?
How so? We add or change the available parameters all the time.
> * can the values be changed when not in recovery, if so what happens,
> and again will that confuse anybody?
Should be similar to archive_command and archive_mode. You can still
see and change archive_command when archive_mode is off.
> * is there any security hazard from ordinary users being able to see
> what settings had been used?
Again, not much different from the archive_* settings. They are, after
all, almost the same in the opposite direction.