"Brendan Jurd" <direvus@gmail.com> writes:
> A quick recap: I submitted a patch for empty ARRAY[] syntax back in
> November, and as far as I can see it never made it to the patches
> list. Gregory suggested a different way of approaching the problem
> (quoted below), but nobody commented further about how it might be
> made to work.
> I'd like to RFC again on Gregory's idea, and if that doesn't bear any
> fruit I'd like to submit the patch as-is for review.
Greg's idea is basically to invent array-of-UNKNOWN as a genuine
datatype, which as I stated way back when seems fairly dangerous
to me. UNKNOWN is already a pretty slippery animal, and I don't
know what cast paths we might open up by doing that. I think
the require-a-cast solution is a lot less likely to result in
unforeseen side-effects.
>> Whereas my patch requires you to write
>> a text[]: =array[]::text[];
>> ... which seems pretty stupid.
In practice you'd write
DECLARE
a text[] := '{}';
which is even shorter, so I don't find this convincing.
regards, tom lane
