Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Date
Msg-id 1315529.1759502516@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> writes:
> If you look at this more closely, creating postgres-full.xml and running 
> the syntax check perform the same operations, except that the latter 
> throws away the output.  So it seems redundant to build a whole new code 
> path for this.  I think you can make the check target dependent on 
> postgres-full.xml and be done, kind of like this (starting from 
> pre-b2922562726):

Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether?
It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs
took many minutes.  But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder
if anyone else has either.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Next
From: Nathan Bossart
Date:
Subject: use SIMD in GetPrivateRefCountEntry()