Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
Date
Msg-id 1314989651.11695.6.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@rice.edu>)
Responses Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?
List pgsql-hackers
On ons, 2011-08-31 at 13:12 -0500, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> Hmm, this thread seems to have petered out without a conclusion. Just
> wanted to comment that there _are_ non-password storage uses for these
> digests: I use them in a context of storing large files in a bytea
> column, as a means to doing data deduplication, and avoiding pushing
> files from clients to server and back.

But I suppose you don't need the hash function in the database system
for that.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL "low watermark" during base backup
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: symbol mismatches on minor version upgrades