Re: replication_timeout does not seem to be working - Mailing list pgsql-admin

From alexondi
Subject Re: replication_timeout does not seem to be working
Date
Msg-id 1314089382271-4726014.post@n5.nabble.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: replication_timeout does not seem to be working  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: replication_timeout does not seem to be working  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-admin
>If no reply is returned from the standby in replication_timeout, the master
thinks
>that the connected standby is inactive, and terminates the replication
connection.
>This is useful for the master to detect a standby crash or network outage.

After that master commit current transaction with "local" synchronous_commit
or rollback?

And why I setup this parameter replication_timeout = 2s and my wal's thread
(on master and server are restarted within 2s)?

--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/replication-timeout-does-not-seem-to-be-working-tp4620827p4726014.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - admin mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

pgsql-admin by date:

Previous
From: Venkat Balaji
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL-9.0.1
Next
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: replication_timeout does not seem to be working