Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> One thing to I must clarify: coverage for most of pgoutput.c looks
> okay on each run. I am concerned that the coverage for the code added
> by the patch is shown to be close to zero, which is a mystery to me,
> because I can confirm by other means such as debugging elogs() to next
> to the new code that the newly added tests do cover them.
According to
https://coverage.postgresql.org/src/backend/replication/pgoutput/index.html
the coverage is pretty good. Maybe you're doing something wrong
in enabling coverage testing locally?
regards, tom lane
