Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
Date
Msg-id 1312480811.24208.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: TRUE/FALSE vs true/false
List pgsql-hackers
On tor, 2011-08-04 at 14:44 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 2011-08-04 14:32 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
> > 2011/8/4 Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>:
> >> Shouldn't these get fixed to be consistent?
> > I believe I already did.  See commit 85b436f7b1f06a6ffa8d2f29b03d6e440de18784.
> 
> I meant a mass "sed -e 's/TRUE/true/g'  -e 's/FALSE/false/g'" run
> so all the ~200 occurrences of both "TRUE" and "FALSE" get
> converted so the whole source tree is consistent.

I would be in favor of that.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Next
From: Phil Sorber
Date:
Subject: Re: patch: move dumpUserConfig call in dumpRoles function of pg_dumpall.c