Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Michael Graham
Subject Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks
Date
Msg-id 1312386341.24461.75.camel@brutus
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks
List pgsql-general
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 11:40 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> The other problem is that once autovacuum has gotten the lock, it has
> to keep it for long enough to re-scan the truncatable pages (to make
> sure they're still empty).  And it is set up so that any access to the
> table will kick autovacuum off the lock.  An access pattern like that
> would very likely prevent it from ever truncating, if there are a lot
> of pages that need to be truncated.  (There's been some discussion of
> modifying this behavior, but nothing's been done about it yet.)

Ah!  This looks like it is very much the issue.  Since I've got around
150GB of data that should be truncatable and a select every ~2s.

Just to confirm would postgres write:

2011-08-03 16:09:55 BST ERROR:  canceling autovacuum task
2011-08-03 16:09:55 BST CONTEXT:  automatic vacuum of table
"traffic.public.logdata5queue"

Under those circumstances?

Cheers,
--
Michael Graham <mgraham@bloxx.com>



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Vacuum as "easily obtained" locks