Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences
Date
Msg-id 1310225398.3012.236.camel@jdavis
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Extra check in 9.0 exclusion constraint unintended consequences  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 22:51 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I'm wondering if we might want to call this out with a <note> or
> similar...  especially if we're only going to put it into the 9.0
> docs.

Sure, sounds good.

Regards,Jeff Davis




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Davis
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Creating temp tables inside read only transactions
Next
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)