Re: Discussion - Search Objects - Mailing list pgadmin-hackers

From Guillaume Lelarge
Subject Re: Discussion - Search Objects
Date
Msg-id 1308253698.2036.4.camel@laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Discussion - Search Objects  (Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Discussion - Search Objects  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Re: Discussion - Search Objects  (Jasmin Dizdarevic <jasmin.dizdarevic@gmail.com>)
List pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 23:48 +0200, Jasmin Dizdarevic wrote:
> Yeah, I know. All of the dialogs have a "binding" to some pgObject,
> because all of them modifies something.

No, see dlgFindAndReplace.

>  When I started working I had no clear picture about the class
> hierarchy and I thought this would be an easier entry point. I can
> change the prefix if this is wished.
>

Yeah, I think it would be better.

> btw: You could help me with the factory class. Am I starting the
> dialog correctly?
>

Seems good to me. My only question is: why in frmMain.ccp and not in
frmSearchObject.cpp? I first tried the latter, and was surprised to find
it in the former.

BTW, can you stop top-posting please? Thanks.

Regards.


--
Guillaume
  http://blog.guillaume.lelarge.info
  http://www.dalibo.com


pgadmin-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Guillaume Lelarge
Date:
Subject: Re: wrong sql code for fk covering index
Next
From: Dave Page
Date:
Subject: Re: Discussion - Search Objects