Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost
Date
Msg-id 1308086222-sup-6394@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [WIP] cache estimates, cache access cost  (Cédric Villemain <cedric.villemain.debian@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Cédric Villemain's message of mar jun 14 17:10:20 -0400 2011:

> If we can have ALTER TABLE running on heavy workload, why not.
> I am bit scared by the effect of such reloption, it focus on HINT
> oriented strategy when I would like to allow a dynamic strategy from
> the server. This work is not done and may not work, so a reloption is
> good at least as a backup  (and is more in the idea suggested by Tom
> and others)

Hmm, sounds like yet another use case for pg_class_nt.  Why do these
keep popping up?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID
Next
From: Jaime Casanova
Date:
Subject: Re: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID