Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun jun 06 12:10:24 -0400 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Hmm interesting. I don't think the placement suggested by Tom would be
> > useful, because the Zabbix backends are particularly busy all the time,
> > so they wouldn't run ProcessCatchupEvent at all.
>
> Yeah, I wasn't that thrilled with the suggestion either. But we can't
> just have backends constantly closing every open FD they hold, or
> performance will suffer. I don't see any very good place to do this...
How about doing something on an sinval message for pg_database?
That doesn't solve the WAL problem Kevin found, of course ...
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
