Re: inconvenient compression options in pg_basebackup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: inconvenient compression options in pg_basebackup
Date
Msg-id 1306437999.27440.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: inconvenient compression options in pg_basebackup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: inconvenient compression options in pg_basebackup  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On tis, 2011-05-24 at 15:34 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I would argue that -Z ought to turn on "gzip" without my having to
> write
> -z as well (at least when the argument is greater than zero; possibly
> -Z0 should be allowed as meaning "no compression"). 

My concern with that is that if we ever add another compression method,
would we then add another option to control the compression level of
that method?



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: SSI predicate locking on heap -- tuple or row?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] pg_class reltuples/relpages not updated by autovacuum/vacuum