Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date
Msg-id 1305330796.2359.17.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 19:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>
> It should be okay to move, since the -devel subpackage requires the
> main one.  Therefore there is no configuration in which pg_config
> would be present before and missing after the change.

Thanks Tom. I can make this change in next build set.

Regards,

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexey Klyukin
Date:
Subject: Re: 'tuple concurrently updated' error for alter role ... set
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and PGPORT