Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Subject Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Date
Msg-id 1304540278.2880.583.camel@lenovo01-laptop03.gunduz.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Responses Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>)
List pgsql-advocacy
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 13:13 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> > So, are the remaining ones "slow"? That is not good from marketing
> (and
> > technical) perspective.
>
> How about Faster Tables?

Yeah, I thought that, too -- actually I really do like Unlogged Tables
(someone in TR told me that it *sounds* like a great innovation ;) ),
but looks like I'm not inside the majority in here.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Community: devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org  Twitter: http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz

Attachment

pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Unlogged vs. In-Memory