Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:44:39 -0300 2011:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Also, most of the sections are pretty short. Making each of them a
> > chapter seems a waste. I think some of them deserve a full chapter
> > (dblink, citext?, hstore, intarray, ltree, pgbench, pgcrypto, pgtrgm?,
> > pg_upgrade, tablefunc), but most don't. (Some of the others could,
> > perhaps, get moved under "Reference").
> >
> > Would it work to move only some?
>
> I think moving some would be even worse than what we have now, unless
> you can propose some logic about why they would be split.
Remember that this thread is about someone being unable to build a PDF
from our docs (and the proposed workaround being "insert more page
breaks"), not about how logical the documentation is.
In any case, the ones I listed are the ones that have more structure
documentation-wise (which also are the ones that have received more
attention and thus are of more interest to users), so there is some
logic behind it.
Am I saying that not all contrib modules are created equal? Yes, I am.
So sue me.
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
