Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of mar abr 26 12:15:50 -0300 2011:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > > On lr, 2011-03-12 at 09:13 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> OK, it is not something worthwhile, or just something you don't have
> > >> time for. If the later, can you give us a hint on how to fix it?
> >
> > > I'm not even sure what the actual action item is supposed to be.
> >
> > The last suggestion in the thread was to move the contrib docs up one
> > level in the hierarchy, ie each contrib module would get a chapter not a
> > sect1.
>
> I think we would have to move "Additional Supplied Modules" up into its
> own book, and then list each module. The problem is that there are 42
> modules so that list is going to be pretty long in the table of
> contents.
Also, most of the sections are pretty short. Making each of them a
chapter seems a waste. I think some of them deserve a full chapter
(dblink, citext?, hstore, intarray, ltree, pgbench, pgcrypto, pgtrgm?,
pg_upgrade, tablefunc), but most don't. (Some of the others could,
perhaps, get moved under "Reference").
Would it work to move only some?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
