On lör, 2011-03-26 at 09:41 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> You can't be guaranteed that they won't standardize something
> incompatible no matter what we do. We could choose to do it as you've
> proposed and they could then standardize some weird syntax - the => is
> a fairly relevant example of exactly that.
The matter of how to resolve SQL parameter names is already
standardized. See clause on <identifier chain>.
