Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This time around, please do not remove API functions just because you
>> can't find a reference to them in the core code. I would like to see
>> a posted, discussed patch first.
> OK, here is my match to mark items as static or not used:
> ftp://momjian.us/pub/postgresql/mypatches/static
By and large, this just demonstrates the silliness of using an automated
tool for this purpose :-(. The hits in gist and gin might be valid ---
Teodor would need to comment on that --- but almost every one of the
others is a "no, don't do that". As an example, you've successfully
reverted this recent patch in toto:
2006-04-26 20:46 tgl
* src/: backend/utils/adt/selfuncs.c, include/utils/selfuncs.h: Ifwe're going to expose VariableStatData for contrib
modulesto use,then we should export a reasonable set of the supporting routinestoo.
The fundamental problem with find_static is that it hasn't got a clue
about likely future changes, nor about what we think external add-ons
might want ...
regards, tom lane
